An acoustic inspection is only as good as its limits. Working intuitively (or worse: copy-paste from a similar project) creates either too many false rejects or lets real defects through. Statistics helps.
The base assumption: normal distribution
Most inspection metrics (natural frequency, level per order, loudness) follow a normal distribution in series production. Practical finding from thousands of projects.
Step 1: collect reference data
- 30–100 OK parts, spread across shifts and days.
- Compute μ and σ per metric.
- Test for normality (Q-Q plot, Shapiro-Wilk).
Step 2: set limits
3σ → 99.73 % within limits, ~2,700 ppm false rejects. 4σ → 63 ppm, 6σ → 3.4 ppb.
Step 3: process capability
- Cpk < 1.0: not capable.
- Cpk = 1.33: standard.
- Cpk ≥ 1.67: high capability.
- Cpk ≥ 2.0: Six Sigma.
Step 4: tolerance intervals for finite samples
With only 50 parts σ is estimated, not known. Tolerance intervals account for this with k from DIN ISO 16269. Example: n = 30, 95 % confidence, 99 % coverage → k ≈ 3.35 instead of 3.0.
Step 5: handle drift
- Static: limits cover all known variation.
- Adaptive: limits track sliding mean over last 1,000 parts.
- Hierarchical: hard safety limits + adaptive warning thresholds.
Practical example: brake disc mode 4
50 OK discs: μ = 4,318 Hz, σ = 6.2 Hz. 3σ rule: 4,299–4,337 Hz. Tolerance interval (n = 50, 95 %/99 %): 4,297–4,339 Hz. False reject rate ~250 ppm. Real cracks all < 4,280 Hz – safely outside.