Why This Comparison?
In industrial quality assurance, manufacturing managers regularly face the question: which testing method offers the best balance of detection reliability, speed and cost-effectiveness? Our new whitepaper systematically compares acoustic testing with CT and X-ray imaging methods.
What to Expect
Over 10 pages we compare both method classes across five key dimensions:
- Test speed: Cycle times in inline applications – from part detection to test result
- Cost per inspection: Investment and operating costs in a 5-year comparison for a typical automotive line
- Detection capability: Which defect types does each method detect more reliably? Where are the physical limits?
- Automatability: Integration into fully automated production lines, PLC connectivity, data management
- Environment and safety: Radiation protection, energy consumption, regulatory requirements
Key Finding
Both methods have their place – but for 100 % inline testing of high volumes, acoustic testing offers significant advantages in cycle time and operating costs. CT and X-ray excel in spot-check deep analysis and geometrically complex defect patterns.
Download
The whitepaper is available to you free of charge. Visit our download section or contact us directly – we will send you the PDF by email.